An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know Rotary Tiller
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
We enforce federal competition and consumer protection laws that prevent anticompetitive, deceptive, and unfair business practices.
Find legal resources and guidance to understand your business responsibilities and comply with the law.
View all Competition Matters Blog posts
We work to advance government policies that protect consumers and promote competition.
Find legal resources and guidance to understand your business responsibilities and comply with the law.
Memo from Chair Lina M. Khan to commission staff and commissioners regarding the vision and priorities for the FTC.
View all Technology Blog posts
Learn more about your rights as a consumer and how to spot and avoid scams. Find the resources you need to understand how consumer protection law impacts your business.
Sign up for the latest news
Track enforcement and policy developments from the Commission’s open meetings.
Explore refund statistics including where refunds were sent and the dollar amounts refunded with this visualization.
Our mission is protecting consumers and competition by preventing anticompetitive, deceptive, and unfair business practices through law enforcement, advocacy, and education without unduly burdening legitimate business activity.
Learn more about the FTC
Lina M. Khan was sworn in as Chair of the Federal Trade Commission on June 15, 2021.
Looking for legal documents or records? Search the Legal Library instead.
Looking for legal documents or records? Search the Legal Library instead.
When companies sow deception, they often reap law enforcement. That’s the lesson of a $2 million civil penalty that Kubota North America Corporation will pay for allegedly violating the Made in USA Labeling Rule by falsely labeling replacement parts for its tractors and other agricultural equipment as “ Made in USA.”
In addition to selling tractors and related farm machinery, Kubota sells replacement parts for its products. According to the FTC, since at least 2021, Kubota has labeled thousands of those parts as Made in USA when, in fact, they were imported from overseas. In addition, the FTC says that the company moved some its manufacturing to locations outside the United States and yet continued to label those products as Made in USA.
Count I of the complaint, which the Department of Justice filed on behalf of the FTC, charges Kubota with violating the FTC Act by falsely claiming that imported parts were made in the United States. Count II alleges that the company also violated the Made in USA Labeling Rule. The Rule, which took effect in 2021, prohibits marketers from labeling products as made in the United States unless: (1) “the final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States;” (2) “all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States;” and (3) “all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States.”
The company can hardly claim to be surprised by the FTC’s long-standing Made in USA standard. In 1999, the FTC sued Kubota Tractor Corporation, alleging that the company falsely advertised that some of its tractors were “Made by Kubota in the U.S.A.” when certain models contained significant foreign parts. To settle that case, the company agreed not to promote products as Made in USA unless – among other things – “all, or virtually all, of the component parts of such product, or of all products in such product line, are made in the United States.” That order expired in 2019.
In addition to requiring Kubota North America to pay a $2 million civil penalty – the largest to date for a violation of the Made in USA Labeling Rule – the just-announced proposed settlement prohibits the company from making unqualified U.S.-origin claims for any product unless it can prove that the product’s final assembly or processing and all significant processing takes place in the United States and that all or virtually all components are made and sourced in the U.S. If the company chooses to make a qualified claim – a representation that includes limitations or caveats – that claim must include a clear and conspicuous disclosure about the extent to which the product is made with foreign parts, ingredients, components, or processing. The proposed order also specifies that if Kubota wants to say that a product is assembled in the United States, it must ensure that the item is last substantially transformed in the U.S., its principal assembly takes place here, and U.S. assembly operations are substantial.
The proposed settlement includes practical advice on cultivating truthful Made in USA claims for your products.
The Made in USA Labeling Rule has given the FTC an additional tool for plowing under deceptive representations. The FTC has been challenging misleading Made in USA claims for decades and will continue to use the FTC Act to protect consumers and honest businesses. But the civil penalty provision of the Made in USA Labeling Rule gives companies another reason – in Kubota’s case, two million more reasons – to comply with the law.
Made in USA claims require ongoing substantiation. According to the FTC, after Kubota moved its manufacturing for some replacement parts to other countries, it failed to update the labeling of those products to reflect that change. Companies’ manufacturing processes are rarely static. As you make modifications, make sure your advertising and labeling representations remain current.
The lessons of FTC law enforcement should last a lifetime. The 1999 order against Kubota was in place for 20 years, but the FTC says that it didn’t take long after the 2019 expiration of that order for the company to violate the law again. Even when an order is no longer in place, the wiser course of action is to build those compliance lessons into the DNA of your operations.
The FTC has more Made in USA resources for your business.
It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.
The purpose of this blog and its comments section is to inform readers about Federal Trade Commission activity, and share information to help them avoid, report, and recover from fraud, scams, and bad business practices. Your thoughts, ideas, and concerns are welcome, and we encourage comments. But keep in mind, this is a moderated blog. We review all comments before they are posted, and we won’t post comments that don’t comply with our commenting policy. We expect commenters to treat each other and the blog writers with respect.
We don't edit comments to remove objectionable content, so please ensure that your comment contains none of the above. The comments posted on this blog become part of the public domain. To protect your privacy and the privacy of other people, please do not include personal information. Opinions in comments that appear in this blog belong to the individuals who expressed them. They do not belong to or represent views of the Federal Trade Commission.
I purchased a Kubota 0turn 1011 machine the rod that puts the transmission in neutral easily bent it was so weak that I comm to them that the rod that engage the blade is so weak I told them that this metal rod was probably made in China they charged me I think it was $125 to fix it I have the receipt I’m a disabled vet I can’t afford to take this machines ack and forth to their shop.It went twice in a week and a half I think I’ve been had I’m not looking for an excuse just worried weather I will keep having a problem and having to fight them over bad possibly made in china equipment I was charged 10 or 11 thousand for this machine I’m down to 3500 dollars I’d love to get my money back and give them their machine back and put it down on a John Deere It only has 78 to 80 hours or what the gage records hardly use it
How do I know my recently purchased tractor was made in USA ?
Machinery Farm Rotary Tiller And Beater What about all of the customers that have cheap spin off parts and go bad three years later. Who is going to pay for the new part,labor, transportation to get tractor to dealer and down cost of not being able to use it. 2 million is a spit in the bucket to them. Make it 200 and back track who got the cheap parts and replace the cheap parts with genuine Kabota parts. That is if 200 million would cover this corrupt situation.